Earlier this month, CES attendees got a taste of the future with dazzling displays of toy robots, smart assistants, and various AI/VR/8K gadgetry. But amid all the remarkable tech innovations on the horizon, one thing is left off the menu: user privacy. As we anticipate the rocky road ahead, there are three major pitfalls that have privacy experts concerned.

Bio hazard

Biometric authentication—using traits like fingerprints, iris, and voice to unlock devices—will prove to be a significant threat to user privacy in 2018 and beyond. From a user’s perspective, this technology streamlines the authentication process. Convenience, after all, is the primary commodity exchanged for privacy.

Mainstream consumer adoption of biometric tech has grown leaps and bounds recently, with features such as fingerprint readers becoming a mainstay on modern smartphones. Last fall, Apple revealed its Face ID technology, causing some alarm among privacy experts. A key risk in biometric authentication lies in its potential as a single method for accessing multiple devices or facilities.  You can’t change your fingerprints, after all. Biometric access is essentially akin to using the same password across multiple accounts.

“Imagine a scenario where an attacker gains access to a database containing biometric data,” said Webroot Sr. Advanced Threat Research Analyst Eric Klonowski. “That attacker can then potentially replay the attack against a variety of other authenticators.”

That’s not to say that biometrics are dead on arrival. Privacy enthusiasts can find solace in using biometrics in situations such as a two-factor authentication supplement. And forward-thinking efforts within the tech industry, such as partnerships forged by the FIDO Alliance, can help cement authentication standards that truly protect users. For the foreseeable future, however, this new tech has the potential to introduce privacy risks, particularly when it comes to safely storing biometric data.

Big data, big breaches

2017 was kind of a big year for data breaches. Equifax, of course, reined king by exposing the personal information (including Social Security Numbers) of some 140 million people in a spectacular display of shear incompetence. The Equifax breach was so massive that it overshadowed other big-data breaches from the likes of Whole Foods, Uber, and the Republican National Committee.

It seems no one—including the government agencies we trust to guard against the most dangerous online threats—was spared the wrath of serious data leaks. Unfortunately, there is no easy remedy in sight, and the ongoing global invasion of user privacy is forcing new regulatory oversight, such as the upcoming GDPR to protect EU citizens. The accelerated growth of technology, while connecting our world in ways never thought possible, has also completely upended traditional notions surrounding privacy.

The months ahead beg the question: What magnitude of breach will it take to trigger a sea change in our collective expectation of privacy? 

Talent vacuum

The third big issue that will continue to impact privacy across the board is the current lack of young talent in the cybersecurity industry. This shortfall is a real and present danger. According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the information security workforce will face a worldwide talent shortage of 1.5 million by 2020.

Some of this shortfall is partly to blame on HR teams that fail to fully understand what they need to look for when assessing job candidates. The reality is that the field as a whole is still relatively new and is constantly evolving. Cybersecurity leaders looking to build out diverse teams are wise to search beyond the traditional background in computer science. Webroot Vice President and CISO Gary Hayslip explained that a computer science degree is not something on his radar when recruiting top talent for his teams.

“In cyber today, it’s about having the drive to continually educate yourself on the field, technologies, threats and innovations,” said Hayslip. “It’s about being able to work in teams, manage the resources given to you, and think proactively to protect your organization and reduce the risk exposure to business operations.

Beyond shoring up recruiting practices for information security roles, organizations of all types should consider other tactics, such as providing continual education opportunities, advocating in local and online communities, and inevitably replacing some of that human talent with automation.

This article was provided by our service partner : webroot.com 

There’s no end to ransomware in sight. It’s a simple enough attack — install malware, encrypt data/system, and ask for the ransom — so why aren’t we stopping ransomware?  Security vendors are keenly aware of the issue, as well as the attack vectors and methods, but can’t seem to stay a step ahead, causing ransomware to grow form $1 billion in damages in 2016 to an estimated $5 billion in 2017. There are two basic reasons ransomware continues to be a “success” for cyber criminals.

Reason 1: Malware authors are getting better at their craft

Just when we think we’re getting on top of the ransomware problem, our adversaries alter their tactics or produce new techniques to replicate and cause damage and misery. We’ve recently seen ransomware like WannaCry take advantage of unpatched vulnerabilities in the Windows SMB service to propagate around networks, especially those that had SMB open to the internet — A clever technique borrowed from mid-to-late 90s Windows worm malware like Sasser. We’ve also seen malware writers develop new techniques for installing malicious code onto computers via Microsoft Office. While the threat posed by malicious macros in Office documents has existed for a number of years, we’re now seeing the use of a Microsoft protocol called Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) to run malicious code. Unlike macro-based attacks, the DDE attack doesn’t give the user a pop-up, prompt or warning, so exploitation is far more effective and successful.

The technological advances made by malware authors are significant, but their soft skills, like social engineering, also keep on getting better. Improved writing, more realistic email presentation, and even solid social engineering tactics are all cause for the increase in their success.

And if you’re good at what you do, make it a service and profit on those that have a similar interest, but lack your skills. Thus, “crime-as-a-service” and “malware-as-a-service” now exist, further perpetuating the ransomware problem. The availability and ease of use of these platforms, means anyone can turn to cybercrime and ransomware with little or no coding or malware experience. These platforms and networks are run by organized cybercrime gangs, for vast profits, so we won’t see them going away any time soon,

Reason 2: We’re causing our own problems

Of course, there’s still one large problem many of us have not dealt with yet, and that’s the weaknesses we ourselves cause that become the entry way for the cybercriminals. WannaCry was so successful because it leveraged an unpatched windows vulnerability. NotPetya did the same. So, what are the weaknesses?

1. A lack of patching – We continue to shoot ourselves in the foot here, because we don’t have solid protection and prevention routines that include the patching of operating systems and applications — especially those leveraged by ransomware authors to gain access.
2. Not enough (reliable) backups – A lack of validated backups — the primary ransomware recovery tool — can leave us out in the cold and unproductive. It’s a simple equation: if you have backups, you choose recovery over ransom.
3. User awareness – Users simply don’t understand the threat, the impact, or the cost of a ransomware infection. But, nor should they really — they have a job to do in accounting or sales, not IT security. Even so, putting in solid phishing training and testing can make a material difference.
4. A lack of least privilege – The more access a user has, the greater scope of infection the ransomware can have. With 71% of end users say they have access to company data they should not be able to see^[1], IT has some serious work to do to ensure privileges are locked down.
5. No layered defense – A single security solution, such as an antivirus, can only do so much to protect the organization. You need solutions like IPS, an email gateway, endpoint protection, and more all working on concert to give ransomware as little a chance of succeeding as possible.

Doing something about the ransomware problem

What should you do to stop ransomware being so successful? Hide? Run away? Unplug the internet? Probably none of those ideas are likely to solve this problem, although out of sight and all that. I mentioned briefly above, the idea of many thin layers of defense, and while ‘defense in depth’ might seem a little old school and became extinct when we lost control of the network perimeter, there are some ideas we can borrow:

1. Defense in depth – Make sure you have a solid, proactive security stance in place, including: patching, least privilege, user training, etc.
2. Protect the endpoint – Desktop and endpoint protection solutions can offer some degree of protection, however, keep in mind that malware can adapt itself to these solutions and circumvent them.
3. Plan for the worst – Ransomware seems to find a way and you need to make sure you can recover when it does. Backups, off-site backups and backups on different media types are essential. Make sure you test their recovery too, as you don’t want to be finding out how to restore a backup in anger. They say you train hard to fight easy. Never has that been more true for IT contingency planning.

Get these three things right, and you’ll be a lot closer to stopping the rain of ransomware from ruining your day, night or weekend.

This article was provided by our service partner : Veeam.com